Strikes landed per minute minus strikes absorbed. The most cited single predictor there is: who wins the exchanges on average. It separates a busy fighter from an effective one, which output alone never does.

Share of takedown attempts that land. Read it with the volume: a fighter who shoots twice a fight and hits both is a different problem from one who shoots ten times and hits five.

This fighter’s takedown rate adjusted for the other corner’s takedown defence, per 15 minutes. A career average of 3.1 means one thing against ordinary defence and almost nothing against someone who stops 91%. An estimate, not a forecast.

Strikes landed per minute adjusted for the other corner’s striking defence. Scaled so a league-average opponent returns the fighter’s own number, so anything above or below is the matchup talking.

Seconds spent controlling the opponent, per 15 minutes of fighting, across their last bouts. Widely held to be the most telling grappling number there is, and no site publishes it as a career figure because UFCStats only prints it one bout at a time. We add it up ourselves.

Knockdowns per 100 significant strikes landed. Volume says how busy someone is and accuracy says how often they connect; neither says whether anything lands hard enough to matter. A knockdown every fifty strikes and one every five hundred are different problems, and every published number reports them the same.

Of everything they land, the share the scorers count as significant. The rest is the grappling exchange: short shots in the clinch and against the fence. A low number is not weakness, it is a wrestler.

Share of significant strikes landed from the ground rather than at range or in the clinch. Separates two fighters with identical output doing completely different jobs: one picking the opponent apart at distance, the other landing everything from top position.

Share of significant strikes aimed at the head. High means hunting the finish; low usually means a body and leg game grinding someone down over three rounds.

Share of wins by knockout or submission. High means the judges rarely get involved.

Strikes landed and absorbed per minute added together, so it counts traffic in both directions. Not a quality measure, a texture one: it says whether their fights are firefights or chess.

Mean length of the recent bouts on record. With finish rate it separates the fighter who ends things early from the one who wins every decision, which a record reports identically.

Time since the last bout. Cuts both ways and the number does not know which: a long one can mean rust and accumulated damage, or a fighter who finally got a full camp.

How much of this record was set at this level. It is also the sample size under every other number on this card, which is why a small one is flagged.

Strikes landed per minute minus strikes absorbed. The most cited single predictor there is: who wins the exchanges on average. It separates a busy fighter from an effective one, which output alone never does.

Share of takedown attempts that land. Read it with the volume: a fighter who shoots twice a fight and hits both is a different problem from one who shoots ten times and hits five.

This fighter’s takedown rate adjusted for the other corner’s takedown defence, per 15 minutes. A career average of 3.1 means one thing against ordinary defence and almost nothing against someone who stops 91%. An estimate, not a forecast.

Strikes landed per minute adjusted for the other corner’s striking defence. Scaled so a league-average opponent returns the fighter’s own number, so anything above or below is the matchup talking.

Seconds spent controlling the opponent, per 15 minutes of fighting, across their last bouts. Widely held to be the most telling grappling number there is, and no site publishes it as a career figure because UFCStats only prints it one bout at a time. We add it up ourselves.

Knockdowns per 100 significant strikes landed. Volume says how busy someone is and accuracy says how often they connect; neither says whether anything lands hard enough to matter. A knockdown every fifty strikes and one every five hundred are different problems, and every published number reports them the same.

Of everything they land, the share the scorers count as significant. The rest is the grappling exchange: short shots in the clinch and against the fence. A low number is not weakness, it is a wrestler.

Share of significant strikes landed from the ground rather than at range or in the clinch. Separates two fighters with identical output doing completely different jobs: one picking the opponent apart at distance, the other landing everything from top position.

Share of significant strikes aimed at the head. High means hunting the finish; low usually means a body and leg game grinding someone down over three rounds.

Share of wins by knockout or submission. High means the judges rarely get involved.

Share of losses that came by knockout. A rough durability read. Two fighters with the same record are not the same proposition if one only ever loses decisions.

Strikes landed and absorbed per minute added together, so it counts traffic in both directions. Not a quality measure, a texture one: it says whether their fights are firefights or chess.

Mean length of the recent bouts on record. With finish rate it separates the fighter who ends things early from the one who wins every decision, which a record reports identically.

Time since the last bout. Cuts both ways and the number does not know which: a long one can mean rust and accumulated damage, or a fighter who finally got a full camp.

How much of this record was set at this level. It is also the sample size under every other number on this card, which is why a small one is flagged.

Strikes landed per minute minus strikes absorbed. The most cited single predictor there is: who wins the exchanges on average. It separates a busy fighter from an effective one, which output alone never does.

Share of takedown attempts that land. Read it with the volume: a fighter who shoots twice a fight and hits both is a different problem from one who shoots ten times and hits five.

This fighter’s takedown rate adjusted for the other corner’s takedown defence, per 15 minutes. A career average of 3.1 means one thing against ordinary defence and almost nothing against someone who stops 91%. An estimate, not a forecast.

Strikes landed per minute adjusted for the other corner’s striking defence. Scaled so a league-average opponent returns the fighter’s own number, so anything above or below is the matchup talking.

Seconds spent controlling the opponent, per 15 minutes of fighting, across their last bouts. Widely held to be the most telling grappling number there is, and no site publishes it as a career figure because UFCStats only prints it one bout at a time. We add it up ourselves.

Knockdowns per 100 significant strikes landed. Volume says how busy someone is and accuracy says how often they connect; neither says whether anything lands hard enough to matter. A knockdown every fifty strikes and one every five hundred are different problems, and every published number reports them the same.

Of everything they land, the share the scorers count as significant. The rest is the grappling exchange: short shots in the clinch and against the fence. A low number is not weakness, it is a wrestler.

Share of significant strikes landed from the ground rather than at range or in the clinch. Separates two fighters with identical output doing completely different jobs: one picking the opponent apart at distance, the other landing everything from top position.

Share of significant strikes aimed at the head. High means hunting the finish; low usually means a body and leg game grinding someone down over three rounds.

Share of wins by knockout or submission. High means the judges rarely get involved.

Share of losses that came by knockout. A rough durability read. Two fighters with the same record are not the same proposition if one only ever loses decisions.

Strikes landed and absorbed per minute added together, so it counts traffic in both directions. Not a quality measure, a texture one: it says whether their fights are firefights or chess.

Mean length of the recent bouts on record. With finish rate it separates the fighter who ends things early from the one who wins every decision, which a record reports identically.

Time since the last bout. Cuts both ways and the number does not know which: a long one can mean rust and accumulated damage, or a fighter who finally got a full camp.

How much of this record was set at this level. It is also the sample size under every other number on this card, which is why a small one is flagged.

Strikes landed per minute minus strikes absorbed. The most cited single predictor there is: who wins the exchanges on average. It separates a busy fighter from an effective one, which output alone never does.

Share of takedown attempts that land. Read it with the volume: a fighter who shoots twice a fight and hits both is a different problem from one who shoots ten times and hits five.

This fighter’s takedown rate adjusted for the other corner’s takedown defence, per 15 minutes. A career average of 3.1 means one thing against ordinary defence and almost nothing against someone who stops 91%. An estimate, not a forecast.

Strikes landed per minute adjusted for the other corner’s striking defence. Scaled so a league-average opponent returns the fighter’s own number, so anything above or below is the matchup talking.

Seconds spent controlling the opponent, per 15 minutes of fighting, across their last bouts. Widely held to be the most telling grappling number there is, and no site publishes it as a career figure because UFCStats only prints it one bout at a time. We add it up ourselves.

Knockdowns per 100 significant strikes landed. Volume says how busy someone is and accuracy says how often they connect; neither says whether anything lands hard enough to matter. A knockdown every fifty strikes and one every five hundred are different problems, and every published number reports them the same.

Of everything they land, the share the scorers count as significant. The rest is the grappling exchange: short shots in the clinch and against the fence. A low number is not weakness, it is a wrestler.

Share of significant strikes landed from the ground rather than at range or in the clinch. Separates two fighters with identical output doing completely different jobs: one picking the opponent apart at distance, the other landing everything from top position.

Share of significant strikes aimed at the head. High means hunting the finish; low usually means a body and leg game grinding someone down over three rounds.

Share of wins by knockout or submission. High means the judges rarely get involved.

Share of losses that came by knockout. A rough durability read. Two fighters with the same record are not the same proposition if one only ever loses decisions.

Strikes landed and absorbed per minute added together, so it counts traffic in both directions. Not a quality measure, a texture one: it says whether their fights are firefights or chess.

Mean length of the recent bouts on record. With finish rate it separates the fighter who ends things early from the one who wins every decision, which a record reports identically.

Time since the last bout. Cuts both ways and the number does not know which: a long one can mean rust and accumulated damage, or a fighter who finally got a full camp.

How much of this record was set at this level. It is also the sample size under every other number on this card, which is why a small one is flagged.

Strikes landed per minute minus strikes absorbed. The most cited single predictor there is: who wins the exchanges on average. It separates a busy fighter from an effective one, which output alone never does.

Share of takedown attempts that land. Read it with the volume: a fighter who shoots twice a fight and hits both is a different problem from one who shoots ten times and hits five.

This fighter’s takedown rate adjusted for the other corner’s takedown defence, per 15 minutes. A career average of 3.1 means one thing against ordinary defence and almost nothing against someone who stops 91%. An estimate, not a forecast.

Strikes landed per minute adjusted for the other corner’s striking defence. Scaled so a league-average opponent returns the fighter’s own number, so anything above or below is the matchup talking.

Seconds spent controlling the opponent, per 15 minutes of fighting, across their last bouts. Widely held to be the most telling grappling number there is, and no site publishes it as a career figure because UFCStats only prints it one bout at a time. We add it up ourselves.

Knockdowns per 100 significant strikes landed. Volume says how busy someone is and accuracy says how often they connect; neither says whether anything lands hard enough to matter. A knockdown every fifty strikes and one every five hundred are different problems, and every published number reports them the same.

Of everything they land, the share the scorers count as significant. The rest is the grappling exchange: short shots in the clinch and against the fence. A low number is not weakness, it is a wrestler.

Share of significant strikes landed from the ground rather than at range or in the clinch. Separates two fighters with identical output doing completely different jobs: one picking the opponent apart at distance, the other landing everything from top position.

Share of significant strikes aimed at the head. High means hunting the finish; low usually means a body and leg game grinding someone down over three rounds.

Share of wins by knockout or submission. High means the judges rarely get involved.

Share of losses that came by knockout. A rough durability read. Two fighters with the same record are not the same proposition if one only ever loses decisions.

Strikes landed and absorbed per minute added together, so it counts traffic in both directions. Not a quality measure, a texture one: it says whether their fights are firefights or chess.

Mean length of the recent bouts on record. With finish rate it separates the fighter who ends things early from the one who wins every decision, which a record reports identically.

Time since the last bout. Cuts both ways and the number does not know which: a long one can mean rust and accumulated damage, or a fighter who finally got a full camp.

How much of this record was set at this level. It is also the sample size under every other number on this card, which is why a small one is flagged.

Strikes landed per minute minus strikes absorbed. The most cited single predictor there is: who wins the exchanges on average. It separates a busy fighter from an effective one, which output alone never does.

Share of takedown attempts that land. Read it with the volume: a fighter who shoots twice a fight and hits both is a different problem from one who shoots ten times and hits five.

This fighter’s takedown rate adjusted for the other corner’s takedown defence, per 15 minutes. A career average of 3.1 means one thing against ordinary defence and almost nothing against someone who stops 91%. An estimate, not a forecast.

Strikes landed per minute adjusted for the other corner’s striking defence. Scaled so a league-average opponent returns the fighter’s own number, so anything above or below is the matchup talking.

Seconds spent controlling the opponent, per 15 minutes of fighting, across their last bouts. Widely held to be the most telling grappling number there is, and no site publishes it as a career figure because UFCStats only prints it one bout at a time. We add it up ourselves.

Knockdowns per 100 significant strikes landed. Volume says how busy someone is and accuracy says how often they connect; neither says whether anything lands hard enough to matter. A knockdown every fifty strikes and one every five hundred are different problems, and every published number reports them the same.

Of everything they land, the share the scorers count as significant. The rest is the grappling exchange: short shots in the clinch and against the fence. A low number is not weakness, it is a wrestler.

Share of significant strikes landed from the ground rather than at range or in the clinch. Separates two fighters with identical output doing completely different jobs: one picking the opponent apart at distance, the other landing everything from top position.

Share of significant strikes aimed at the head. High means hunting the finish; low usually means a body and leg game grinding someone down over three rounds.

Share of wins by knockout or submission. High means the judges rarely get involved.

Share of losses that came by knockout. A rough durability read. Two fighters with the same record are not the same proposition if one only ever loses decisions.

Strikes landed and absorbed per minute added together, so it counts traffic in both directions. Not a quality measure, a texture one: it says whether their fights are firefights or chess.

Mean length of the recent bouts on record. With finish rate it separates the fighter who ends things early from the one who wins every decision, which a record reports identically.

Time since the last bout. Cuts both ways and the number does not know which: a long one can mean rust and accumulated damage, or a fighter who finally got a full camp.

How much of this record was set at this level. It is also the sample size under every other number on this card, which is why a small one is flagged.

Strikes landed per minute minus strikes absorbed. The most cited single predictor there is: who wins the exchanges on average. It separates a busy fighter from an effective one, which output alone never does.

Share of takedown attempts that land. Read it with the volume: a fighter who shoots twice a fight and hits both is a different problem from one who shoots ten times and hits five.

This fighter’s takedown rate adjusted for the other corner’s takedown defence, per 15 minutes. A career average of 3.1 means one thing against ordinary defence and almost nothing against someone who stops 91%. An estimate, not a forecast.

Strikes landed per minute adjusted for the other corner’s striking defence. Scaled so a league-average opponent returns the fighter’s own number, so anything above or below is the matchup talking.

Seconds spent controlling the opponent, per 15 minutes of fighting, across their last bouts. Widely held to be the most telling grappling number there is, and no site publishes it as a career figure because UFCStats only prints it one bout at a time. We add it up ourselves.

Knockdowns per 100 significant strikes landed. Volume says how busy someone is and accuracy says how often they connect; neither says whether anything lands hard enough to matter. A knockdown every fifty strikes and one every five hundred are different problems, and every published number reports them the same.

Of everything they land, the share the scorers count as significant. The rest is the grappling exchange: short shots in the clinch and against the fence. A low number is not weakness, it is a wrestler.

Share of significant strikes landed from the ground rather than at range or in the clinch. Separates two fighters with identical output doing completely different jobs: one picking the opponent apart at distance, the other landing everything from top position.

Share of significant strikes aimed at the head. High means hunting the finish; low usually means a body and leg game grinding someone down over three rounds.

Share of wins by knockout or submission. High means the judges rarely get involved.

Share of losses that came by knockout. A rough durability read. Two fighters with the same record are not the same proposition if one only ever loses decisions.

Strikes landed and absorbed per minute added together, so it counts traffic in both directions. Not a quality measure, a texture one: it says whether their fights are firefights or chess.

Mean length of the recent bouts on record. With finish rate it separates the fighter who ends things early from the one who wins every decision, which a record reports identically.

Time since the last bout. Cuts both ways and the number does not know which: a long one can mean rust and accumulated damage, or a fighter who finally got a full camp.

How much of this record was set at this level. It is also the sample size under every other number on this card, which is why a small one is flagged.

Strikes landed per minute minus strikes absorbed. The most cited single predictor there is: who wins the exchanges on average. It separates a busy fighter from an effective one, which output alone never does.

Share of takedown attempts that land. Read it with the volume: a fighter who shoots twice a fight and hits both is a different problem from one who shoots ten times and hits five.

Seconds spent controlling the opponent, per 15 minutes of fighting, across their last bouts. Widely held to be the most telling grappling number there is, and no site publishes it as a career figure because UFCStats only prints it one bout at a time. We add it up ourselves.

Knockdowns per 100 significant strikes landed. Volume says how busy someone is and accuracy says how often they connect; neither says whether anything lands hard enough to matter. A knockdown every fifty strikes and one every five hundred are different problems, and every published number reports them the same.

Of everything they land, the share the scorers count as significant. The rest is the grappling exchange: short shots in the clinch and against the fence. A low number is not weakness, it is a wrestler.

Share of significant strikes landed from the ground rather than at range or in the clinch. Separates two fighters with identical output doing completely different jobs: one picking the opponent apart at distance, the other landing everything from top position.

Share of significant strikes aimed at the head. High means hunting the finish; low usually means a body and leg game grinding someone down over three rounds.

Share of wins by knockout or submission. High means the judges rarely get involved.

Share of losses that came by knockout. A rough durability read. Two fighters with the same record are not the same proposition if one only ever loses decisions.

Strikes landed and absorbed per minute added together, so it counts traffic in both directions. Not a quality measure, a texture one: it says whether their fights are firefights or chess.

Mean length of the recent bouts on record. With finish rate it separates the fighter who ends things early from the one who wins every decision, which a record reports identically.

Time since the last bout. Cuts both ways and the number does not know which: a long one can mean rust and accumulated damage, or a fighter who finally got a full camp.

How much of this record was set at this level. It is also the sample size under every other number on this card, which is why a small one is flagged.

Strikes landed per minute minus strikes absorbed. The most cited single predictor there is: who wins the exchanges on average. It separates a busy fighter from an effective one, which output alone never does.

Share of takedown attempts that land. Read it with the volume: a fighter who shoots twice a fight and hits both is a different problem from one who shoots ten times and hits five.

This fighter’s takedown rate adjusted for the other corner’s takedown defence, per 15 minutes. A career average of 3.1 means one thing against ordinary defence and almost nothing against someone who stops 91%. An estimate, not a forecast.

Strikes landed per minute adjusted for the other corner’s striking defence. Scaled so a league-average opponent returns the fighter’s own number, so anything above or below is the matchup talking.

Seconds spent controlling the opponent, per 15 minutes of fighting, across their last bouts. Widely held to be the most telling grappling number there is, and no site publishes it as a career figure because UFCStats only prints it one bout at a time. We add it up ourselves.

Knockdowns per 100 significant strikes landed. Volume says how busy someone is and accuracy says how often they connect; neither says whether anything lands hard enough to matter. A knockdown every fifty strikes and one every five hundred are different problems, and every published number reports them the same.

Of everything they land, the share the scorers count as significant. The rest is the grappling exchange: short shots in the clinch and against the fence. A low number is not weakness, it is a wrestler.

Share of significant strikes landed from the ground rather than at range or in the clinch. Separates two fighters with identical output doing completely different jobs: one picking the opponent apart at distance, the other landing everything from top position.

Share of significant strikes aimed at the head. High means hunting the finish; low usually means a body and leg game grinding someone down over three rounds.

Share of wins by knockout or submission. High means the judges rarely get involved.

Share of losses that came by knockout. A rough durability read. Two fighters with the same record are not the same proposition if one only ever loses decisions.

Strikes landed and absorbed per minute added together, so it counts traffic in both directions. Not a quality measure, a texture one: it says whether their fights are firefights or chess.

Mean length of the recent bouts on record. With finish rate it separates the fighter who ends things early from the one who wins every decision, which a record reports identically.

Time since the last bout. Cuts both ways and the number does not know which: a long one can mean rust and accumulated damage, or a fighter who finally got a full camp.

How much of this record was set at this level. It is also the sample size under every other number on this card, which is why a small one is flagged.

Strikes landed per minute minus strikes absorbed. The most cited single predictor there is: who wins the exchanges on average. It separates a busy fighter from an effective one, which output alone never does.

Share of takedown attempts that land. Read it with the volume: a fighter who shoots twice a fight and hits both is a different problem from one who shoots ten times and hits five.

Seconds spent controlling the opponent, per 15 minutes of fighting, across their last bouts. Widely held to be the most telling grappling number there is, and no site publishes it as a career figure because UFCStats only prints it one bout at a time. We add it up ourselves.

Knockdowns per 100 significant strikes landed. Volume says how busy someone is and accuracy says how often they connect; neither says whether anything lands hard enough to matter. A knockdown every fifty strikes and one every five hundred are different problems, and every published number reports them the same.

Of everything they land, the share the scorers count as significant. The rest is the grappling exchange: short shots in the clinch and against the fence. A low number is not weakness, it is a wrestler.

Share of significant strikes landed from the ground rather than at range or in the clinch. Separates two fighters with identical output doing completely different jobs: one picking the opponent apart at distance, the other landing everything from top position.

Share of significant strikes aimed at the head. High means hunting the finish; low usually means a body and leg game grinding someone down over three rounds.

Share of wins by knockout or submission. High means the judges rarely get involved.

Share of losses that came by knockout. A rough durability read. Two fighters with the same record are not the same proposition if one only ever loses decisions.

Strikes landed and absorbed per minute added together, so it counts traffic in both directions. Not a quality measure, a texture one: it says whether their fights are firefights or chess.

Mean length of the recent bouts on record. With finish rate it separates the fighter who ends things early from the one who wins every decision, which a record reports identically.

Time since the last bout. Cuts both ways and the number does not know which: a long one can mean rust and accumulated damage, or a fighter who finally got a full camp.

How much of this record was set at this level. It is also the sample size under every other number on this card, which is why a small one is flagged.